<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments for simonrichardson.info</title> <atom:link href="http://www.simonrichardson.info/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.simonrichardson.info</link> <description>ActionScript &#38; Android</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:24:36 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>Comment on Closing down by Jackson Dunstan</title><link>http://www.simonrichardson.info/2011/12/05/closing-down/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link> <dc:creator>Jackson Dunstan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:24:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonrichardson.info/?p=214#comment-80</guid> <description>Thanks for all the posts!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the posts!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Eleven. Exactly. One louder. by Joan Llenas</title><link>http://www.simonrichardson.info/2011/07/14/eleven-exactly-one-louder/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link> <dc:creator>Joan Llenas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:25:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonrichardson.info/?p=187#comment-55</guid> <description>I agree, the language needs those ECMA4 promises.
The runtime has evolved quite a lot in terms of features but the syntax and is the very same we had when FP9 was released years ago. Even more, they have an implementation already!
Let&#039;s see how this evolves...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the language needs those ECMA4 promises.<br
/> The runtime has evolved quite a lot in terms of features but the syntax and is the very same we had when FP9 was released years ago. Even more, they have an implementation already!<br
/> Let&#8217;s see how this evolves&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on SingleSignal by Simon Richardson</title><link>http://www.simonrichardson.info/2011/03/31/singlesignal/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link> <dc:creator>Simon Richardson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:47:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonrichardson.info/?p=114#comment-43</guid> <description>Updated the performance tests and I seem to have gotten the fps wrong, testing to day, clearly shows that DeluxeSignal is 11fps slower in the release player. &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-42&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@ Robert Penner &lt;/a&gt; - this is caused by the adding of listeners by priority.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Updated the performance tests and I seem to have gotten the fps wrong, testing to day, clearly shows that DeluxeSignal is 11fps slower in the release player. <a
href="#comment-42" rel="nofollow">@ Robert Penner </a> &#8211; this is caused by the adding of listeners by priority.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on SingleSignal by Robert Penner</title><link>http://www.simonrichardson.info/2011/03/31/singlesignal/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link> <dc:creator>Robert Penner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 03:55:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonrichardson.info/?p=114#comment-42</guid> <description>This exact thing was on my backlog, so thanks for saving me some work!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This exact thing was on my backlog, so thanks for saving me some work!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Flash issues. by Simon Richardson</title><link>http://www.simonrichardson.info/2010/09/06/flash-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link> <dc:creator>Simon Richardson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:49:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonrichardson.info/?p=89#comment-17</guid> <description>Because unfortunately I&#039;m not fortunate to write just haXe, I also have to output my library as a swc. I prefer not to use a naming convention, which is why I was asking for namespaces on the haXe mailing list sometime ago.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because unfortunately I&#8217;m not fortunate to write just haXe, I also have to output my library as a swc. I prefer not to use a naming convention, which is why I was asking for namespaces on the haXe mailing list sometime ago.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Flash issues. by Pimm Hogeling</title><link>http://www.simonrichardson.info/2010/09/06/flash-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link> <dc:creator>Pimm Hogeling</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:10:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonrichardson.info/?p=89#comment-16</guid> <description>Hey Simon,
One question. You mention that &quot;once everything is compiled it becomes public, no matter how you write it&quot;, which is ehm... almost true, yeah.
But as you know, the haXe compiler provides such &quot;access&quot; safety at compile-time. Why would not having such safety at run-time, too, be a problem then?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Simon,</p><p>One question. You mention that &#8220;once everything is compiled it becomes public, no matter how you write it&#8221;, which is ehm&#8230; almost true, yeah.</p><p>But as you know, the haXe compiler provides such &#8220;access&#8221; safety at compile-time. Why would not having such safety at run-time, too, be a problem then?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Android: First glance by Android: Reuse everything. &#171; simonrichardson.info</title><link>http://www.simonrichardson.info/2010/08/10/android-first-glance/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link> <dc:creator>Android: Reuse everything. &#171; simonrichardson.info</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:57:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonrichardson.info/?p=64#comment-9</guid> <description>[...] you might have known (previous post), I&#8217;ve been tasked to go and learn Android. I&#8217;ve mentioned in the last post that [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you might have known (previous post), I&#8217;ve been tasked to go and learn Android. I&#8217;ve mentioned in the last post that [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Unit tests (Part 2) by Unit tests (Part 1) &#171; simonrichardson.info</title><link>http://www.simonrichardson.info/2010/04/25/unit-tests-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link> <dc:creator>Unit tests (Part 1) &#171; simonrichardson.info</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:07:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonrichardson.info/?p=39#comment-7</guid> <description>[...] 2: How to setup CI    &#8592; Casting Performance Unit tests (Part 2) [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2: How to setup CI    &larr; Casting Performance Unit tests (Part 2) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Unit tests (Part 1) by Unit tests (Part 2) &#171; simonrichardson.info</title><link>http://www.simonrichardson.info/2010/04/22/unit-tests-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link> <dc:creator>Unit tests (Part 2) &#171; simonrichardson.info</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:05:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonrichardson.info/?p=32#comment-6</guid> <description>[...] part 1 I described the rationale behind why I personally think unit tests can help save you money and time [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] part 1 I described the rationale behind why I personally think unit tests can help save you money and time [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
